Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Gay Agenda


Biblical Exposition Against Homosexuality

· Adhere to the teachings of the Bible.
· Preach against all form of sin (e.g., fornication, adultery, sodomy).
· Insist that the doctrines of grace be taught.

These doctrines of grace were well summed up by John Calvin in his 5 points of Calvinism:

1. Total Depravity of Man WIthout Grace
2. Unconditional Election by God With Grace
3. Limited Atonement of Sins - Jesus Saving Grace Paid The Price
4. Irresistible Grace That is God Given
5. Perseverance of the Saints Through Grace

Although these doctrines are almost universally hated today, they were once loved and believed.

For example, these are just a few examples of people who have advanced these ideas: Augustine (one of the early Church fathers), Martin Luther (the founder of the Lutheran Church), John Knox (the founder of the Presbyterian Church), Augustus Toplady (hymnist and leader in the Episcopal Church), Charles Spurgeon (a well-known preacher), John Leland (who was partially responsible for our First Amendment in the United States), and Abraham Lincoln (raised in a tiny Old School Baptist church).

(Please see The Doctrine of Absolute Predestination by Jerom Zanchius and MEMO ON THE CHURCH.)

Most of the major Confessions of Faith throughout the history of the New Testament Church have also advanced these ideas.

So, even though the Arminian lies (see: Arminianism) that "God loves everyone" and "Jesus died for everyone" are being taught from nearly every pulpit in this generation, teaching this hasn't always been the case.

If your Church claims to believe the Bible and you are hearing these lies from the pulpit of your chirch then your church has apostatized.

Independent research on the history of the Church from Adam to now will benefit anyone interested in salvation.

Read the Bible.


"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." Leviticus 18:22.
See also Leviticus 20:13, Genesis 19, Romans 1:18-32, I Corinthians 6:9-11, I Timothy 1:10, and Jude 7.


"The foolish shall not stand in thy sight, thou hatest all workers of iniquity." Psalm 5:5.
See also Leviticus 20:23, Leviticus 26:30, Deuteronomy 32:19, Psalm 5:6, Psalm 11:5, Malachi 1:3, Matthew 7:23, and Romans 9:13.


"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16.
See also John 13:1, John 17:9, Ephesians 5:25, etc.
“If you love me you will keep my commandments,” says Jesus to us today (John 14:15).


"Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." John 12:39,40.
See also John 10:11,26, Matthew 11:25,26, Acts 13:48, Romans 9:19-24, etc.


"Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD." Jeremiah 6:15.
See also Jeremiah 13:23, Romans 1:24-32, Ezekiel 16:49-50, etc.


"Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal: The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity." II Timothy 2:19. "Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness...unto vile a reprobate mind." Romans 1:24-28.

See also II Timothy 2:24-26, Psalm 5:5, I Corinthians 6:9-11, Acts 17:30, Jude 22,23, etc.


"And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcasses of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh." Isaiah 66:24. "For without are dogs..." Revelation 22:15.
See also Mark 9:44, Luke 16:23, Revelation 20:15.

In summary, sodomites are wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly (Gen. 13:13),

are violent and doom nations (Gen. 19:1-25; Judges 19), are abominable to God (Lev. 18:22),

are worthy of death for their vile, depraved, unnatural sex practices (Lev. 20:13; Rom. 1:32),

are called dogs because they are filthy, impudent and libidinous (Deut. 23:17,18; Mat. 7:6; Phil. 3:2), produce by their very presence in society a kind of mass intoxication from their wine of gall which is produced from the vines of Sodom and the fields of Gomorrah which poisons society's mores with the poison of dragons and the cruel venom of asps (Deut. 32:32,33),

declare their sin and shame on their countenance (Isa. 3:9),

are shameless and unable to blush (Jer. 6:15),

are workers of iniquity and hated by God (Psa. 5:5),

are liars and murderers (Jn. 8:44),

are filthy and lawless (2 Pet. 2:7,8),

are natural brute beasts (2 Pet. 2:12),

are dogs eating their own vomit and sows wallowing in their own feces (2 Pet. 2:22),

will proliferate at the end of the world bringing final judgment on mankind (Lk. 17:28-30),

have been finally given up by God to uncleanness dishonoring their own bodies among themselves, to vile affections, and to a reprobate mind such that they cannot think straight about anything (Rom. 1:23-28),

have wholly given themselves over to fornication and gone after strange flesh (Jude 7), to be saved must be pulled as faggots from the fire (Jude 23),

and have no hope of Heaven unless they repent (Rev. 22:15),

which they can't do in their prideful state (Jer. 6:15).

They need to hear this truth if they are to have any hope of penitence, faith in Jesus Christ and salvation (I Timothy 4:2-4).


The following was written by Michael Swift, a self-confessed "Gay Revolutionary," and appeared in the Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987.


"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy.

We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men.

Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.
All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens.

We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles.

We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals.

You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be.

We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence--will be abolished.

The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated.

Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory.

They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed.

Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets.

One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion.

Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence.

All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions.

We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world.

We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages.

We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.
Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks."

The only true Nazis in this world are fags. They want to force you by law to support their filth, and they want to shut you up by law when they hate what you say. They would be perfectly happy to make it a crime to preach that "God hates fags" under the guise of "hate speech legislation."

Likewise, baby-killers support the genocide of millions of innocent babies, and then act indignant that Hitler killed a few million innocent Jews. See The Pink Swastika by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams.

Jesus died only for His sheep (John 10), His Church (Ephesians 5:25), and His elect (I Peter 1:2). If He died for everyone, everyone would go to heaven. All sins of all people would be forgiven. But obviously, all sins aren't forgiven, because people are burning in hell.

'Pink Swastika,'
Preface to the Fourth Edition:

"When Kevin Abrams and Scott Lively published the first edition of “Pink Swastika” in 1995, they knew that it would cause controversy, contradicting as it does the common portrayal of homosexuals as exclusively victims of the Nazi regime.

"For this reason they were scrupulous in our documentation of homosexuals as the true inventors of Nazism and the guiding force behind many Nazi atrocities.

They purposefully drew heavily upon homosexual writers and historians for their source material and used direct quotations from their own writings whenever possible. The remainder of their sources are primarily mainstream historians of the Nazi era. They chose to place their citations in the text rather than in endnotes to emphasize the reliability of our sources.

Few contemporary historians, however, have weighed in, either pro or con, on the claims of this book. With some notable exceptions, the voices have instead come from ideologues on either side of the “gay rights” issue.

Homosexuals and their allies (including some academics) denounce 'The Pink Swastika' as baseless and hateful.

Pro-family advocates praise it as authoritative and enlightened.

The issues raised in the book deserve broader public scrutiny and debate, especially in academia, and not silence.

This fourth edition represents a renewed effort to put these issues up for debate before the American public.

This edition is a dramatically expanded and strengthened volume with hundreds of additional hours invested in research and writing that is reflected in two new chapters and hundreds of additional citations that have been woven throughout the existing text.

Many helpful photographs and graphics have been added.

What remains is the struggle to persuade academics, church leaders, and cultural leaders to address this subject, which begs the question of why have they not yet done so.

One reason, perhaps, is that The Pink Swastika addresses an aspect of Nazi history unfamiliar to most people, historians included. Indeed, no one could have written The Pink Swastika who was not a student of both history and of the so-called “gay” movement.

The compilation of references to homosexuality from mainstream sources, while extensive, does not in and of itself provide a complete picture of the homosexuals’ role in the rise and rule of Nazism.

Only when that picture is overlaid with the work of “gay” scholars does the essential relationship between Nazism and the German “gay” movement become clear.

Ironically, a better explanation for why The Pink Swastika has been neglected is the dominance of “political correctness” in the academic realm, which is ironic because today’s “PC” code suppresses intellectual dissent to a degree not seen since the Third Reich or in the stiltifying dread of the Soviet.

Only today, the 'verboten' subject-matter is anything that reflects negatively on the “gay” movement.

This trend is not new.

In fact, one of the most remarkable facts uncovered in research for 'The Pink Swastika' is the near complete dearth of references to homosexuality in the Nazi Party in books published in the United States since the end of the 1960s.

Nearly all of mainstream U.S. sources (by American writers) pre-date the 1970s, when the “gay” movement became a political force in this country.

However, other resources, mostly German works translated into English, have continued to enlarge our knowledge of the homosexual/Nazi connection.

One important contributor is, of course, German academic Lothar Machtan, whose, 'Hidden Hitler (2001),' argues persuasively that Hitler’s secret “gay” life defined his career.

In the 1960s, Nazi homosexuality was so widely acknowledged in America (at least among the “social elites”) that the portrayal of Nazi thugs as homosexual was a frequent occurrence in Hollywood movies.

One of the best examples is in Exodus (United Artists, 1960), the film adaptation of the Leon Uris novel about the creation of the State of Israel after World War II.

In the film, actor Sal Mineo, playing a young man attempting to join the Irgun (the Jewish underground movement), fails to convince Irgun leaders that he is a genuine Nazi concentration camp survivor.

Finally they are convinced — only when he breaks down and confesses that the Nazi guards “used me as a woman.”

To the Irgun, this was definitive proof that he had been a Nazi prisoner.

Allen Ginsberg, the homosexual “beat” poet was asked by a Justice of the Supreme Court in 1966 (during an obscenity trial related to the book Naked Lunch, by William Borroughs) whether at “some time in the future there will be a political party, for instance, made up of homosexuals.”

Ginsberg replied, saying “this has already happened in a sense -- or of sex perverts -- and we can point to Hitler, Germany under Hitler” (The New York Times, August 10, 1997)."

These are but two examples which reveal the extent to which homosexuality was openly associated with Nazism in the past. There are many other examples in this book.
Yet today, the record has been almost entirely purged regarding the homosexual/Nazi connection.

This would be alarming enough if it were simply a trend in the popular culture and academia, but a similar whitewashing is also taking place in institutions responsible for keeping the record of the Holocaust.

Dr. Nathaniel Lehrman is a retired psychiatrist who read The Pink Swastika and was inspired to recommend it as a resource to the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.. No political conservative, Dr. Lehrman has for many years contributed articles and editorials to liberal and humanist publications.

After a great deal of effort, including an exchange of correspondence in which he challenged the museum to at least research the claims of this book, he was rebuffed.

In a May 5th, 2000 editorial in the Intermountain Jewish News, Dr. Lehrman took issue with one of the frequent pro-homosexual events at the museum: “[F]or the conference to present a complete picture of gays in the Holocaust, it should also have included the key roles of Nazi homosexuals among its perpetrators. By failing to do so, the Museum fostered the myth of a “Gay Holocaust”....Why is the Holocaust Memorial Museum distorting the history of the Holocaust?”

Another individual, Mr. Zan Overall, donated two copies of The Pink Swastika to the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, the leading Holocaust museum on the West Coast.

He was later told by a staff member that the books had not been placed in the regular collection but in a “special collection” available only upon request by a patron.

Overall writes:
“Wondering how a library patron might become aware of the existence of The Pink Swastika, ensconced in “the special collection,” I asked if it were listed in the computer along with other books on the same general subject....She read off quite a number of titles listed there...and reported The Pink Swastika is not listed there (Overall: private letter).”

Knowing how thoroughly these institutions have been infiltrated by “gay” political activists, the authors of 'The Pink Swastika' were not surprised to learn that they had suppressed the evidence linking Nazism to homosexuality (see: “How American ‘Gays’ are Stealing the Holocaust,” in The Poisoned Stream, Founders Publishing Corporation, 1997).

The same whitewash may be taking place at the Shoah Foundation as it collects the video histories of the last remaining Holocaust survivors. Its founder Steven Spielberg is the business partner of billionaire homosexual activist David Geffin...

Unfortunately, the public perceives these institutions as the final authority on anything having to do with the Nazi era.

As this fourth edition of 'The Pink Swastika,' therefore, the authors are especially mindful that their important work represents perhaps the only significant attempt to counter a highly successful “gay”-sponsored revisionist campaign and endeavored to produce the most thorough and accurate document possible.

This document is by no means the first, but is by far the most complete, resource ever prepared on the thesis that homosexuals invented and ran the Nazi Party, a thesis that has been frequently restated since the 1930s with profound implications for our society, given the growing power of the “gay” movement.

Its significance is all the greater since most people in this country have probably never even heard it mentioned. Let the evidence speak for itself.

No comments: